The Changes I Have Seen: Personal Reminisces of
Printing Processes
I have seen quite a few changes in printing processes in my
life. All have brought improvements, but there were a few drawbacks. My
introduction to some of these processes occurred in school; others were learned
as a process of my job.
Then we got the mimeograph
machine. Now, we could keep information and tests. Drawback? The tests were
getting longer. Often the school only had one machine and there could be a line
waiting to use the machine or it could rumple the template and it would have to
be recreated. That was really frustrating if you were trying to create a
thousand copies of the school paper. The mimeograph process used a two or three
part paper with a film that
felt very waxy and worked like carbon paper. The special paper could be written, drawn, or typed. Then the pages were separated and the top edge of waxy piece was inserted into
a slot of an approximately 8 inch drum. A flip of a switch, clamped the paper
firmly to the drum. As you turned the crank handle on the side, the drum rolled the special
paper through a tray of liquid chemical and then pressed the wet sheet against
a clean sheet to produce the next copy. I remember vividly the smell dampness of fresh copies. Even fourty-five years plus later, when smell something similar it
still reminds me of the color purple, which is the color of the copy. And no,
that was not the sniffed chemicals providing us a group trip.
According to an article by Anne Carney, yearbooks, like other printed books, are a dwindling market and if
newer processes are not adopted, they may become a thing of the past. eHow’s article
on planning a yearbook makes it all seem so simple now. Today, electronic and desktop publishing make
it so easy to lay out pictures and text to create our own e-books or bound books
with much shorter turnaround time. However, many of these lack in quality and
design due to less fact checking, less proofing, and generally sloppy work.
Maryellen Bailey
No comments:
Post a Comment